THAT Council endorse the following response to Metro Vancouver regarding the proposed amendments to Metro 2050, and direct staff to submit it as the City of White Rock’s official comments:
1. Type 3 Amendment: Add new Special Study Areas (SSAs) in the requesting municipalities
Enabling Surrey, Langley Township, and Delta to identify a limited number of new Special Study Areas could support proactive long‑term planning by allowing anticipated land‑use transitions to be considered under a lower voting threshold.
White Rock has no objection to the introduction of new SSAs. SSAs may help ensure more robust, transparent, and evidence‑based reviews prior to any future land‑use designation changes, which aligns with strong regional planning practices. Ensuring that limitations on the scale of SSAs and development of criteria for establishing SSAs remain aligned with regional objectives—particularly around Urban Containment Boundary management, employment land protection, agricultural protection, and infrastructure coordination—will be essential. White Rock recommends that the Metro Vancouver Board consider allowing SSAs in other member municipalities, to ensure fairness for all.
2. Type 1 Amendment: Reclassify amendments to lands with a Rural regional land use designation from Type 2 to Type 3 amendments
Lowering the voting threshold for changes to Rural‑designated lands could streamline the amendment process. However, the City encourages strong safeguards and clear criteria to ensure that any conversions of these lands are carefully assessed, transparent, and consistent with broader climate, food security, and growth‑management objectives.
3. Type 1 Amendment: Expand amendment opportunities for properties adjacent to the Urban Containment Boundary
Allowing lower voting thresholds for certain lands adjacent to the Urban Containment Boundary—where they meet criteria related to ALR exclusion, ecological constraints, servicing availability, and transit‑oriented, complete community planning—could support well‑considered growth in strategic locations.
Any proposals to convert Agricultural or Rural designations to urban land uses should be carefully considered to ensure long term food security, environmental stewardship, and alignment with Metro 2050’s core regional objectives. Further, making changes to the Regional Growth Strategy that create easier amendment opportunities may not be in the best interests of communities like ours that cannot directly contribute to agricultural production and therefore depend on the ongoing protection of these lands across the region. Clear, rigorous application of these criteria will be important to ensure that the proposed amendments support compact, transit‑supportive development without undermining agricultural protection or encouraging unplanned outward expansion.
4. Type 3 Amendment: Expanded use of the flexibility clause (6.2.7) for properties adjacent to the Urban Containment Boundary
Expanding the use of the flexibility clause for small adjustments contiguous with the Urban Containment Boundary may reduce administrative burden by avoiding unnecessary amendment processes. Ongoing monitoring of cumulative impacts will be essential to ensure that incremental changes do not collectively compromise regional objectives related to growth management, food system resilience, and agricultural land preservation.