THAT White Rock City Council:
Recognizing the critical role played by trees on both private and public lands in maintaining the health of ecosystems and the quality of human habitats in urban settings,
Concerned by the loss of trees and decline of tree canopy that have occurred over the past decades in White Rock, particularly on private lands,
Determined to strengthen the City’s efforts to protect its trees and preserve and enhance its tree canopy, and
Having considered the Report of the Environmental Advisory Committee titled “Updating and Strengthening White Rock’s Protection and Management of Trees”,
Directs staff to prepare for Council’s consideration a proposed revision of Tree Management Bylaw 1831, based on the EAC’s recommendations, to:
- Change the title of the Bylaw to “White Rock Tree Protection Bylaw”. [R3]
- Reduce the minimum size for the definition of “protected tree” to a trunk DBH of 20 cm or less. [R5]
- Provide that “significant trees” on private or City lands, to be defined pursuant to a “Significant Tree Policy” to be developed and presented to Council by Staff, will not be removed for other than safety reasons or as approved by Council. [R6]
- Remove fruit trees, alders and cottonwoods from the definition of "lower value trees". [R7]
- Authorize the utilization of tree replacement security and deposit revenues for a broadened range of activities to enhance and protect the City’s tree canopy. [R12]
- Incorporate Policy 510’s provisions regarding notice to adjacent property owners and applicant appeals for Type 2 permit applications and extend these provisions to Type 3 applications, as well as incorporate Planning Procedures Bylaw 2234’s appeal provisions. [R14(a), R18(a)].
- Require that notice of, and opportunity to comment on, any application or proposal to remove a “City tree” be provided to property owners within 100 metres of the affected tree at least 14 days in advance of a decision. [R15]
- Establish International Society of Arboriculture (ISA) certification as the sole and exclusive credential in the definition of “arborist”. [R16(a)]
- Require that City Arborists visit and inspect all sites under consideration for a tree permit. [R16(b)]
- Provide that only City Staff or agents are allowed to remove or plant trees on City lands. [R16(c)]
- Establish explicit criteria for approval of Type 2 and Type 3 permits and to govern decisions by officials regarding the management of trees on City land, taking into account the provisions of Policy 510 and best practices in other jurisdictions. [R17(a)]
- Incorporate any amendments, consistent with the EAC’s recommendations, that may be needed to ensure currency and clarity and consistency with other bylaws and policies. [R19]
Directs staff to prepare for Council’s consideration a proposed revision of Tree Management on City Lands Policy 611, based on the EAC’s recommendations, to:
- Change the title of the Policy to "Tree Protection, Canopy Enhancement and Management on City Lands". [R4(a)]
- Revise the Section 1 Policy Statement to read as follows: “Policy: In managing trees on City land, it is the priority of the City of White Rock to protect existing trees and increase the number of healthy trees and amount of tree canopy and thus enhance and ensure the sustainability of the City’s urban forest and realization of the environmental and esthetic benefits it provides. In this context, the interest of property owners in preserving or restoring private views obstructed by City trees will be addressed through a procedure described in Annex I to this Policy.” [R4(b)]
- Insert in Section 3 “Management of City Trees”, a new clause 3(a)1 specifying an additional statement of purpose to read as follows: “For the overriding purposes of protecting existing trees and increasing the number of healthy trees and amount of tree canopy”. [R4(c)]
- Transfer the provisions of Sections 5, 6, 7 and 8 to an Annex to the Policy. [R4(d)]
- Limit the criteria under which applications for pruning, crown thinning, or width reductions are approved to those where the property owner has clearly demonstrated that the tree has increased in size to completely obscure a previously existing view from the applicant’s property. [R4(e)]
- Prohibit the topping or removal of city trees for the re-establishment of views. [R4(f)]
- Remove references to "narrow corridor" and "single object" views in the definition of “view/view corridor”. [R4(g)]
- Allow for the siting, species selection, and planting of new or replacement trees on City lands in all locations where future growth is not expected to completely obscure established views. [R4(h)]
- Provide that “significant trees” on City lands, to be defined pursuant to a “Significant Tree Policy” to be developed and presented to Council by Staff, will not be removed for other than safety reasons or as approved by Council. [R6]
- Require that, when the City is evaluating initiatives that might result in tree removal on City lands, all possible ways to protect the trees should be considered, and specify ambitious replacement requirements for trees that must be removed. [R8]
- Require that notice of, and opportunity to comment on, any application or proposal to remove a “City tree” be provided to property owners within 100 metres of the affected tree at least 14 days in advance of a decision. [R15]
- Require that City Arborists visit and inspect all sites under consideration for a tree permit. [R16(b)]
- Incorporate criteria established in the revised Bylaw 1831 to govern decisions taken by officials regarding the management of trees on City lands. [R17(b)]
- Incorporate any amendments, consistent with the EAC’s recommendations, that may be needed to ensure currency and clarity and consistency with other policies and bylaws. [R19]
Further directs staff to:
- Develop proposals to give tree preservation and canopy enhancement greater and more explicit priority in zoning and planning regulations and procedures throughout the City. [R1]
- Develop proposals for the adoption of an explicit canopy recovery target (eg, 27% canopy coverage by 2045), for increasing the currently projected maximum number of trees (2500) that can be planted on City land, and for increasing lands on which the City can plant additional trees to help meet the target. [R2(a)]
- Investigate and report to Council on means to prevent the removal of or interference with trees, and to facility the planting of trees, by the City and BNSF on BNSF lands. [R2(c)]
- Review regulations and policies concerning “significant trees” and “heritage trees” and establish a consolidated definition of “significant tree”, a “Significant Tree Policy” and a “Significant Tree Registry”. [R6]
- Review fees, securities, cash-in lieu requirements, replacement values and quotas, and fines to ensure they are commensurate with best practices conducive to preserving and increasing the number of healthy trees and the amount of tree canopy in the City. [R9]
- Review and present any appropriate advice to Council regarding methods and resources employed to ensure effective enforcement of Bylaw 1831 and Policy 611. [R10]
- Maintain a record of contractors that contravene Bylaw 1831 or Policy 611 and take steps to ensure that such contractors are not hired by the City, that relevant fines are levied on them, and/or that their business licences are suspended or revoked. [R11]
- Review and improve methods by which residents and property owners are informed of the importance of tree preservation and the requirements of Policy 611 and Bylaw 1831, and how to notify the City when they believe the Policy and Bylaw are being contravened. [R13]
- Establish International Society of Arboriculture (ISA) certification as the sole and exclusive credential required for a business licence as an arborist. [R16(a)]
- Develop amendments to Planning Procedures Bylaw 2234 to require that all corporate and Advisory Design Panel reports and recommendations to Council regarding planning and development on private lands include a description of implications for tree protection and canopy enhancement. [R18(b)]
- Develop revisions to City policies and procedures, including Policy 611, to prescribe that:
(i) All corporate reports and recommendations presented to Council regarding works to be conducted on City lands include a section describing any implications for tree protection and canopy enhancement.
(ii) All members of Council be informed at least 14 days before the proposed removal of any “City tree”.
(iii) Any member of Council objecting to measures arising under subparagraphs (i) and (ii) may request a Council discussion and decision on the matter. [R18(c)]
Decides to:
- Monitor progress in achieving canopy recovery targets and tree planting goals through annual Tree Canopy Reports to Council that include statistics regarding tree permit applications; actions taken by the City in the management of tree on City lands including the use of revenues from tree permits and tree protection securities; and an analysis of trends and implications for the effectiveness of the City’s tree protection and enhancement efforts. [R2(b), R14(b) R18(d)]
- Conduct, on an annual basis, a public discussion of Tree Canopy Reports prepared by staff. [R18(d)]